Baser sa vision du monde sur des éléments fondés sur les preuves et la science ou sur les croyances et la religion pourrait dépendre, au moins en partie, de la personnalité et de certaines expériences vécues au cours de l’enfance.
Pour donner un sens à ce qui nous entoure, nous nous construisons notre propre vision du monde. Une vision du monde qui peut se baser sur la religion ou la science. Si la religion offre une perspective métaphysique ancrée dans la foi, la spiritualité et les croyances divines ; la science, elle, propose une approche empirique fondée sur l’observation, l’expérimentation et la rationalité. Mais qu’est ce qui fait que nous penchons plus d’un côté, que de l’autre ?
Chronique diffusée le 7 mai 2026. L’ensemble des chroniques est accessible sur une playlist dédiée.
Pour aller plus loin :
« Your personality and upbringing predict if you will lean toward science or faith », par Karina Petrova. Publié sur Psypost, le 13/03/2026. Consulté le 23/04/2026. Lien : https://www.psypost.org/your-personality-and-upbringing-predict-if-you-will-lean-toward-science-or-faith/.
Un autre épisode du podcast en lien :
« La Tête Dans Le Cerveau #199 – L’universelle préférence musicale ».
Sources :
Alexander J.M. et al. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science education, 96 (5) : 763-786.
Carvalho IV J.J. (2006). Overview of the structure of a scientific worldview. Zygon® : journal of religion and science, 41 (1) : 113-124.
Cuevas J.A. et al. (2022). An analysis of the relationships between religious orientation, authoritarianism, cross‐cultural interactions, and political views. Analyses of social issues and public policy, 22 (1) : 408-426.
Czerniawska M. et Szydło J. (2021). Do values relate to personality traits and if so, in what way ? Analysis of relationships. Psychology research and behavior management, 14 (2021) : 511-527.
Goldberg L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4 (1) : 26-42.
Gottfried A.E. et al. (2016). Pathways from parental stimulation of children’s curiosity to high school science course accomplishments and science career interest and skill. International journal of science education, 38 (12) : 1972-1995.
Gunnoe M.L. et Moore K.A. (2002). Predictors of religiosity among youth aged 17–22 : a longitudinal study of the national survey of children. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 41 (4) : 613-622.
Johnson D.D. et Price M.E. (2025). How are science and religion getting along ? An evolutionary perspective. Religion, brain and behavior, 15 (4) : 347-354.
Johnson K.A. et al. (2021). Faith and science mindsets as predictors of COVID-19 concern : a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of experimental social psychology, 96 (104186) : 1-14.
Koenig L.B. et al. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on religiousness : findings for retrospective and current religiousness ratings. Journal of personality, 73 (2) : 471-488.
Koltko-Rivera M.E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of general psychology, 8 (1) : 3-58.
Lanman J.A. et Buhrmester M.D. (2017). Religious actions speak louder than words : exposure to credibility-enhancing displays predicts theism. Religion, brain and behavior, 7 (1) : 3-16.
Lenhausen M.R. et al. (2023). Transactional effects between personality and religiosity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 125 (2) : 421-436.
Lockhart C. et al. (2023). The authoritarian incubator : examining the effect of conversion to christianity on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Group processes and intergroup relations, 26 (5) : 1161-1178.
Łowicki P. et Zajenkowski M. (2020). Empathy and exposure to credible religious acts during childhood independently predict religiosity. The international journal for the psychology of religion, 30 (2) : 128-141.
Myers S.M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance : the importance of family context. American sociological review, 61 (5) : 858-866.
Noy S. et O’Brien T.L. (2018). An intersectional analysis of perspectives on science and religion in the United States. The sociological quarterly, 59 (1) : 40-61.
O’Brien T.C. et al. (2021). Misplaced trust : when trust in science fosters belief in pseudoscience and the benefits of critical evaluation. Journal of experimental social psychology, 96 (104184) : 1-13.
Park C.L. (2005). Religion as a meaning‐making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of social issues, 61 (4) : 707-729.
Park C.L. et al. (2025). How are relying on religion and on science to make sense of the world associated with health-related resources and behaviors and well-being ? Psychology and health, 40 (3) : 454-473.
Park C.L. et al. (2025). Childhood experiences and personal traits as predictors of reliance on science and on religion to make sense of the world : results of a national US study. Religion, brain and behavior, 15 (4) : 400-412.
Pennycook G. et al. (2016). Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers : four empirical studies and a meta-analysis. Plos one, 11 (4) : 1-18.
Rutjens B.T. et al. (2013). Step by step : finding compensatory order in science. Current directions in psychological science, 22 (3) : 250-255.
Rutjens B.T. et al. (2018). Not all skepticism is equal : exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 44 (3) : 384-405.
Saroglou V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality : a meta-analytic review. Personality and individual differences, 32 (1) : 15-25.
Saroglou V. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits : a five-factor model perspective. Personality and social psychology review, 14 (1) : 108-125.
Shaffer B.A. et Hastings B.M. (2007). Authoritarianism and religious identification : response to threats on religious beliefs. Mental health, religion and culture, 10 (2) : 151-158.
Shenhav A. et al. (2012). Divine intuition : cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of experimental psychology : general, 141 (3) : 423-428.
Subbotsky E. (2001). Causal explanations of events by children and adults : can alternative causal modes coexist in one mind ? British journal of developmental psychology, 19 (1) : 23-45.
Tratner A.E. et al. (2017). Individual differences in childhood religious experiences with peers. Personality and individual differences, 119 : 73-77.
Tratner A.E. et al. (2020). Childhood religious experiences with peers and primary caregivers : associations with individual differences in adult religiosity. Personality and individual differences, 158 (109802) : 1-12.
Wink P. et al. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism : findings from a longitudinal study. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 46 (3) : 321-335.
Source image :
RPA studio – Jeune fille internet jeune garcon (2023). https://www.pexels.com/fr-fr/photo/art-faire-signe-saluer-vague-18718831/
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Christophe Rodo (7 mai 2026). La basculante vision du monde (épisode 351). Cerveau en argot. Consulté le 15 octobre 2026 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/166x1